Interested in conducting original research on the behavioral ecology of spiders?

What is behavioral ecology?
Behavioral ecology is the study of the adaptive value of behavior. Behavioral ecologists use a cost and benefit approach to assess the fitness consequences of various behaviors.
Why study spiders?
Spiders are among the most abundant terrestrial predators on the planet and are therefore extremely important ecologically and economically. Spiders may compose more than 50% of the predatory fauna in some ecosystems and are important biocontrol agents in agricultural systems. Spiders are easily cultured in the lab and studied in the field. They lend themselves well to questions about sexual selection, foraging strategies, predator-prey interactions, communication, parental investment, population biology, and trophic interactions. There are about 35,000 known species (out of a total estimate of 100,000 or more) yet they remain an understudied taxon. Why not venture where few biologists have tread?
Why WOLF spiders?
Wolf spiders make up the greatest biomass of all ground-dwelling predators in agricultural systems. They lie at the interface of both terrestrial and detrital food chains. They are generalist predators that serve to dampen and stabilize populations of many terrestrial arthropods (including other wolf spiders). One study documented that 28% of the energy from all terrestrial arthropods pass through wolf spiders! Females carry their eggs with them, which makes them especially easy to quantify the fitness consequences of their behaviors. They have complex communication systems that involve visual, seismic, auditory, tactile, and chemical sensory channels. A sample of some of the possible areas of research include:
Antipredator behavior- innate and acquired
Predator-mediated space and resource use
Sensory modes used in predator identification
Indirect and direct trophic interactions
Reproductive and foraging costs of antipredator behavior
Information content of chemical, visual, and vibratory signals
Air-borne and substratum-borne pheromone production with age and mating status of females
Male mate choice
Influence of age and reproductive status on mating success and cannibalism risk
Evolution of courtship signals and male ornaments
Influence of male limb and pedipalp loss on mating success
Size-based cannibalism decisions
Kin-recognition and maternal feeding inhibition
Proximate mechanisms and fitness consequences of sexual cannibalism
Influence of habitat heterogeneity, prey abundance, population density, and predation risk on cannicalism and intraguild predation
Intra-guild predation
Foraging patch decisions and prey searching behavior
Proximate mechanisms and functional significance of prey selection and preference
Proximal cues that induce maternal feeding inhibition
Spiderling dispersal cues
Fitness costs of carrying offspring and eggsacs
Offspring benefits of post-emergent maternal care
Influence of rearing container size and heterogeneity on spider behavior (foraging, mating, antipredator behavior etc).
Biochemical characterization of kairomones and pheromones
Effect of experience on predator and prey recognition
Competitive interactions between web-building spiders on campus (funnel-weaving and bowl-and-doily spiders)
Ahmed Alkhateeb (2005-2006) and Mark Prokopovits. Watching your friends get eaten: Bystander effects on predator recognition and subsequent survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. Ahmed Alkhateeb, Mark Prokopovits
Cattell, Joshua*^, and M.H. Persons. (2004-2005). I smell a femme fatale: can male wolf spiders chemically detect a cannibalistic prospective mate?
Dan Church (2002-2003). Preliminary identification of a putative lycosid kairomone
Tipton, Erin*^, and M.H. Persons. 2005. The effect of male-male competition and information availability on the courtship and copulatory behavior of the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae; Lycosidae).
Published Student ProjectsSchonewolf, K.*, Bell, R., Rypstra, A.L. & Persons, M.H^.. In press. Field evidence of an airborne enemy-avoidance kairomone in wolf spiders.Journal of Chemical Ecology.
Lynam, E.C.*, Owens, J.C.*, & Persons, M.H.^. In press. The influence of pedipalp autotomy on the courtship and mating behavior of Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior.
Taylor, A.R.*, Persons, M.H.^, Rypstra, A.L. 2005. The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae).Journal of Arachnology.33:76-81.
Lehmann, L.*, S.E. Walker, & M.H. Persons^. 2004. The influence of predator sex on chemically-mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology. 110:1-17.pdf (proof-version of article).
Persons, M.H., & E.C. Lynam. 2004.Pardosa milvina(Araneae, Lycosidae) spiderling dispersal in the presence of conspecific and heterospecific lycosid silk and excreta.Journal of Arachnology. 32:341-344.
Brautigam, S.E. & Persons, M.H. In press. The effect of limb loss on the courtship and mating behavior of the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior
Rypstra, A.L, Wieg, C., Walker, S.E. & M.H. Persons. 2003. Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology. 109:315-325.
Barnes, M.C., Persons, M.H. & A.L. Rypstra. 2002. The effect of predator chemical cue age on chemically-mediated antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior. 15: 269-281.
Brueseke, M.A., A.L. Rypstra, S.E. Walker and M.H. Persons. 2001. Leg autotomy in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina: a common phenomenon with few apparent costs. American Midland Naturalists. 146: 153-160
Persons, M.H., Fleishman, L.J., Frye, M.A., & M.E. Stimphil. 1999. Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards . Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 184: 585-607.
Searcy, L.E., Rypstra, A.L., & M.H. Persons. 1999. Airborne chemical communication in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 25: 2527-2533.
Still not sure? Contact Matt Persons for more information (
Persons@susqu.edu, 372-4526) or browse through the research interests section of my homepage.